- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Get in here statist: LSU anthem controversy
Posted on 4/5/24 at 6:45 am to Philzilla2k
Posted on 4/5/24 at 6:45 am to Philzilla2k
quote:It's so sad you can vote.
Downvote for crying about downvotes.
This is hard for you I know, but nobody gives a shite about the downvotes you moron. I want the so called "small government conservatives" who applauded Landry's calls for compelled speech and action to not only downvote, but come explain why state sanctioned, mandatory at-calls are good.
So far, there's no one, save a few "sports" fanatics and one guy who has nothing to say other than bitch and moan about there being a thread about his governor who looks like a damn fool.
It's why this board and many of its adherents is a complete joke: it's an echo chamber of hypocrisy filled with individuals who know far more about their team quarterback's Twitter page than they do fundamental constitutional rights.
Posted on 4/5/24 at 6:51 am to mudshuvl05
Your confusion comes from your belief you are smart. I don’t agree with Landry, but your blanket compelled speech diatribe has no basis in the law. There are many examples of consequences from speech. Whether that should be the case or not can be discussed. Is the University compelled to continue a scholarship for a student athlete that is making blatantly racist or sexist or other discriminatory statements? I doubt a University is compelled to continue paying the tuition, room, and board for that student.
That isn’t what happened here and Landry looks silly for doubling down on his mistake. It does not change that you’re argument is one based upon emotion and not in an analysis of the law.
That isn’t what happened here and Landry looks silly for doubling down on his mistake. It does not change that you’re argument is one based upon emotion and not in an analysis of the law.
This post was edited on 4/5/24 at 6:57 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News