Started By
Message

re: 70% of wealthy Americans approve of the MSM, Congress and university professors.

Posted on 3/27/24 at 4:10 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124330 posts
Posted on 3/27/24 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

The OP was citing a poll as reported on War Room that said Americans who are considered the 1% (net worth of at least $5.5 million) have a 70% approval of Congress, the MSM and college professors.
There are a number of 1%'ers on this board.
They rub elbows with other 1%'ers.
The claim that 70% of 1%'ers support Democrats is bullshite!

In America, the vast majority of 1%'ers are self-made.

I'd guess (conservatively) < 20% of self-made 1%'ers "support Democrats."

However, as the > $500M group accounts for a disproportionate amount of 1% wealth, and a majority or that group supports Dems, statistical skew or manipulation is possible.

E.g. You cited HH net wealth of $5.8M as a Top1% qualification. That is a median-based stat. Going by averages, a HH needs to be worth $38M to be in the Top 1%.

Without access to the poll in question, it can't be disassembled for you.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101732 posts
Posted on 3/27/24 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

There are a number of 1%'ers on this board.
They rub elbows with other 1%'ers.
The claim that 70% of 1%'ers support Democrats is bullshite!

In America, the vast majority of 1%'ers are self-made.

I'd guess (conservatively) < 20% of self-made 1%'ers "support Democrats."

However, as the > $500M group accounts for a disproportionate amount of 1% wealth, and a majority or that group supports Dems, statistical skew or manipulation is possible.

E.g. You cited HH net wealth of $5.8M as a Top1% qualification. That is a median-based stat. Going by averages, a HH needs to be worth $38M to be in the Top 1%.

Without access to the poll in question, it can't be disassembled for you.



I would venture to guess, a poll purporting to pinpoint "the 1%" is likely skewing toward the more conspicuous segment of that group, as I'm not sure how they are otherwise determining who is who in their methodology, which could tend to skew it away from the ACTUAL views of such a group.

Just a possible hypothesis. I have nothing to otherwise suggest or be able to say that they aren't just about right on the money with what they are saying here, though.
This post was edited on 3/27/24 at 5:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram