Started By
Message

re: Mark Buehrle: HOF or no?

Posted on 3/24/24 at 1:12 am to
Posted by Saunson69
Member since May 2023
2022 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 1:12 am to
isn't a perfect game also a no hitter? So technically all 23 have had a no hitter.
Posted by Tigers0891
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2017
6662 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 1:23 am to
No , technically it’s a no hitter plus no batters reaching base.

I’d probably not vote him in, but he doesn’t deserve an automatic no. Starters weren’t pulled as early as they are now but he didnt pitch in the old iron man era either. 300 wins is not a practical metric for any pitcher that has started their career the last ten years, yet his last season was 8 years ago so he is in the range of things slowly shifting.

Also going against him is that he wasn’t the high 90’s fastball, high 80’s wipeout slider guy. He had some serious talent but his pitches themselves weren’t top percentile necessarily so that doesn’t help his case. I like watching pitchers that don’t have to just overpower everyone.

Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
31232 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 6:34 am to
quote:

isn't a perfect game also a no hitter?


Yes, one is a subset of the other. All perfect games are no-hitters, not all no-hitters are perfect games.

quote:

So technically all 23 have had a no-hitter.



Yes but the OP added the word another. So one perfect game and another no-hitter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram