- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire Tomatometer - 45% Critics / 87% Audience (SPOILERS)
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:30 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:30 pm to finchmeister08
The first movie was lightning in a bottle where all the elements just came together perfectly. Wonderful script,special effects that still hold up today and most importantly the comedic chemistry of Aykroyd,Murray,Ramis, and Hudson.
Afterlife had nothing but member berries going for it imo As much as the 2016 film sucked I think it was the right approach. Find a group of comedic actors and writers that have good chemistry and move on from the legacy story and actors of the 1984 film.
Afterlife had nothing but member berries going for it imo As much as the 2016 film sucked I think it was the right approach. Find a group of comedic actors and writers that have good chemistry and move on from the legacy story and actors of the 1984 film.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:15 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Afterlife had nothing but member berries going for it imo As much as the 2016 film sucked I think it was the right approach. Find a group of comedic actors and writers that have good chemistry and move on from the legacy story and actors of the 1984 film.
please tell me you keep this same attitude for top gun...
Posted on 3/23/24 at 11:37 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:This. Afterlife was full of corny dad jokes written by people who just aren't funny. If you're a consumer simply looking to ingest your unit of entertainment, I guess it's fine (a word I keep seeing) but to me, it's watered down, bland bullshite. Afterlife is a better overall movie than chickbusters, but the latter gave be more genuine laughs. Sure, it was maybe two total laughs, but it was still better than the 10 or so halfhearted chuckles I got from Afterlife. Endless callbacks being in this one aren't going to rope me in.
Afterlife had nothing but member berries going for it imo As much as the 2016 film sucked I think it was the right approach. Find a group of comedic actors and writers that have good chemistry and move on from the legacy story and actors of the 1984 film.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News