Started By
Message

re: Judge: Jury Sees Secret Files or Trump Wins

Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:05 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425882 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I mean, this is common sense. If part of the test is whether the records are confidential, the records themselves must be examined to make a determination that they are, in fact, confidential.

The documents can be authenticated via other means, though.

A jury doesn't get to demand to see video of a surgery to make a determination that surgical medical records reflect what occurred. The doctor testifies to that.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99877 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

A jury doesn't get to demand to see video of a surgery to make a determination that surgical medical records reflect what occurred. The doctor testifies to that


Um...the jury doesnt "demand" anything. The defense (or plaintiff/prosecution) can absolutely challenge that doctor's testimony regarding the records with the video (if that evidence exists). Ignoring cumulative evidence, five different "experts" can testify about something (and "authenticate" it), but the other side has the right to present the evidence to the finder of fact for them to make the determination.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40521 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

A jury doesn't get to demand to see video of a surgery to make a determination that surgical medical records reflect what occurred. The doctor testifies to that.


The doctor…

Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
11125 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:03 am to
quote:

The documents can be authenticated via other means, though.
maybe they can joetato's ghostwriter to do it
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13695 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:12 am to
quote:

A jury doesn't get to demand to see video of a surgery to make a determination that surgical medical records reflect what occurred. The doctor testifies to that


So in this example would Fauci be the expert?????????

They are intel documents, maybe the 17 intel agencies or the 51 former employees???????

Thats why you have a jury of your peers, surely you arent that obtuse.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram