No.

I call people who are being emotional, emotional.

Primarily because it's a line MAGA-Patriots love to throw out, ironically sometimes while melting the frick down

It's why I always like to point out the big government/Leftist economics of MAGA when I can, b/c they love to lie about that, too.

quote:
That’s his equivalent of accusing people who disagree with you of being “racist”.

Wrong. Plenty of people disagree with me and I don't call them emotional.

Just look at the post I responded to:

quote:
You see why people are pissed. So maybe just STFU and let them be pissed.

Admitting emotional thinking of others

quote:
No one wants to hear your gaslighting bullshite.

Displaying emotional thinking, individually

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by thebigmuffaletta

Member since Aug 2017

13168 posts

Posted on 3/16/24 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro

quote:
No

Yes, it’s your go to accusation when your arguments fail to persuade someone or when another poster rebuts your arguments.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by NC_Tigah

Carolinas

Member since Sep 2003

124536 posts

Posted on 3/17/24 at 5:02 am to SlowFlowPro

quote:
I call people who are being emotional, emotional.

You also call people who are not being emotional, emotional. You then extrapolate the mischaracterization to one of irrationality. Of course anything irrational is assumed dismissable.

Even if your irrationality predicate was valid, it's badly undercut by projection ...

e.g.,
"it's a line MAGA-Patriots love to throw out, ironically sometimes while melting the frick down

" ... not exactly the stuff of emotionless intellectuality, SFP.

Frankly though, I suspect it doesn't bother most folks when you post emotionally as you do, tossing in 5 or 6 extraneous "literally"s and several "LOL" emojis in the process. It's just not that big a deal.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board