Started By
Message

re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries

Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425823 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Isn't the issue here the fact she couldn't consent because of the here drunkenness and not the physical injury of the sex?

The lack of DNA opens up the door to argue penetration never occurred, and this would be used by the defense to argue even the injuries can't be linked to any contact with the defendants.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
28072 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:29 pm to
Ouch. I did not know there was a lack of DNA.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6475 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


If there is evidence that the injuries referenced in the arrest warrant did in fact happen the day before, and with the report that no DNA evidence was found, could a judge dismiss this entire thing? I'm not asking IF the judge will but could the judge? Based on the above evidence...
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
616 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 3:16 pm to
This post was edited on 4/5/24 at 2:31 pm
Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
11621 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 6:22 pm to
I will beat your arse if you tell me where to meet you. Then report back.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Of course your sorry, corrupt, lying, TPOS arse would side with those F’N useless TPOS bums. You low life scum!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram