- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apple Or Android? May The Battle Continue.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 10:57 am to Fat Batman
Posted on 3/30/24 at 10:57 am to Fat Batman
quote:
thats actually straight from the article YOU posted as some kind of victory lap, but actually destroyed every one of your points. You sure you read it and understood it?
NO. That's what the Biden appointed Attorney General is saying is a basis for filing anti trust litigation against a private business.
You aren't even understanding the basics of what's going here.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 11:01 am to TigerGman
quote:
against a private business
quote:
You aren't even understanding the basics of what's going here.
please enlighten me on the DOJs case is then?
This post was edited on 3/30/24 at 11:02 am
Posted on 3/30/24 at 12:09 pm to TigerGman
quote:
You aren't even understanding the basics of what's going here.
form your previous posts ive gathered you think the "basic issues" are
1. That this is a political issue and pandering to poors.
This is not the case because similar cases have been brought against most, if not all, of the major tech giants under various regimes over the years for abusing network effects. Also, obtaining an iPhone has never been easier. In fact, low switching cost for new users is part of the anticompetitive ploy the DOJ is accusing Apple of abusing.
2. This is hurts Apple
Well no shite. If they are using abusing network effects to boost their bottom line and market share, of course removing that practice will hurt both of those for them. If you really believed that Apple was solely thriving on their platform/device superiority, then the outcome of the case should have little effect on Apple.
Points you are refusing to address directly:
1. How this is bad for the consumer.
2. Why the grounds for the case is valid or not.
3. Whether you believe the DOJ should be able to try to prevent anticompetitive behavior in markets, and why.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News