Started By
Message

re: Barrett joins liberal justices on Trump ballot ban ruling going too far

Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:44 pm to
Posted by MemphisGuy
Member since Nov 2023
4029 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

One can disagree, but I don't see it as something to attack her for.


It's not. Some people look for reasons to get butthurt, no matter which side of the aisle they are on.

"OMG, she agreed with us, but didn't COMPLETELY agree with EVERYTHING and didn't agree the way we wanted her to agree"
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 1:46 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425616 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

It's not. Some people look for reasons to get butthurt, no matter which side of the aisle they are on.

"OMG, she agreed with us, but didn't COMPLETELY agree with EVERYTHING and didn't agree the way we wanted her to agree"


The irony is they keep bringing up the "women are emotional" talking point while they are engaging in emotion-based demands of outrage
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram