- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER: "...there is No Climate Emergency"
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:55 am to The Maj
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:55 am to The Maj
quote:
It is cute you thinks this means anything in this day and time...
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:24 am to rnojoman
quote:
it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
It doesn't mean what it once did, pops and on this particular subject it has never really meant much... Just because a bunch of paid scientists get on the band wagon in order to keep their grift going doesn't make it true...
Try to keep up...
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:46 pm to rnojoman
quote:
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
Fauci's pets did a peer reviewed paper, at his request, to show that the virus was a zoonotic escape.
quote:
House Republicans convened a hearing last week on the conference call and the resulting paper, and one of the major sources of contention was the extent to which Fauci and Collins held financial sway over the scientists, who also had a grant application pending before the NIH. Democrats repeatedly characterized the argument in terms of a “bribe” being paid in exchange for a paper that exonerated a lab in Wuhan, China, that the NIH had been funding to do the kind of risky research that could spark a pandemic. Rather than a bribe, though, the question is one of leverage.
Peer Review is tantamount to politically influenced when government wields millions of dollars in grants.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:51 pm to rnojoman
quote:
Looks like we found the idiot who doesn't know what peer reviewed means
Hint - it doesn't mean sourcing your insane and frankly idiotic claims with some right wing grifter's tweet, son.
What is the end game for some of you who just blindly follow anything?
What do you get out of it? Do you feel safe?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News