Started By
Message

re: Does insurance violate the basic laws of economics?

Posted on 3/1/24 at 10:42 am to
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25565 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 10:42 am to
No, “owning” things people can’t afford is what creates the need for insurance.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7632 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

No, “owning” things people can’t afford is what creates the need for insurance.


that's overly simplistic and not necessarily a blanket truth.

I own my house (or will own it outright in a little over a year from now).
my house took significant damage from Hurricane Ida.

If I pay for all of those damages out of pocket (which I ended up doing thanks to my homeowner's insurance company filing bankruptcy in Ida's wake), then you have to tack that $70k on to what I paid for the house.

but the value of my house doesn't increase by $70k despite me spending that on it.

meaning I just added $70k to the cost of my house while the value remained stagnant.

So if I sell it, I take a $70k hit (with some movement due to market at time of sale obviously).

Had I sold it "as is" prior to repairs, then the value is nowhere near what I paid for it and I lose big there.

I can afford the house.
I paid to fix it.

throwing away $70,000 isn't a very wise financial decision whether you can afford it or not.












Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
12148 posts
Posted on 3/1/24 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

No, “owning” things people can’t afford is what creates the need for insurance.

Lol
Simplistic thoughts sound great usually.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram