- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules no attorney-client privilege for Nathan Wade’s former lawyer
Posted on 2/27/24 at 7:34 am to moneyg
Posted on 2/27/24 at 7:34 am to moneyg
quote:
.intentionally wrong to limit the appearance of wrongdoing.
0 for 3.
Some firms (and doctors and other small businesses) operate this way. It's not "intentionally wrong". That's the incorrect criticism. They were sloppy and purposefully ignorant. Criticizing them for what they actually did, and reflecting reality and not this fantasy, should be enough for any rational thinker.
But if you're invested in emotionally projecting them as some evil duo, then fine, create your LARP scenario.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News