Started By
Message

re: In just a few years, the average retiree will be receiving 37% more in SS than he paid in

Posted on 2/25/24 at 8:06 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124546 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Now do the 75-85% of people who will receive SS who would have $0 invested if it were up to them.
Just make IRA contributions obligatory at a >6.2% rate plus a 6.2% employer match.

That will never happen, because SS's purpose is not to benefit retirees.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425255 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Just make IRA contributions obligatory at a >6.2% rate plus a 6.2% employer match.

And then what happens when the market shifts wildly for each population entering retirement? Remember the 2009 retirees who got absolutely fricked by that market? Or what about people who would retire in 2021, when the market was insanely high?

Again, from an efficiency standpoint, it makes sense. Government programs are about stability and security and not efficiency.

quote:

because SS's purpose is not to benefit retirees.

It is, just not in the most hyper efficient way.

Also, the private IRA methodology would create some pretty hefty inflation. You'd have over $1T invested into private companies and investments every year.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141342 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:02 am to
Didn’t gov employees prior to 1984 not pay into SS?

If that’s accurate, I wonder how the math would have been different if at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram