quote:
Is that proof necessary for an objective morality? If so then we could agree morality might be/might not be objective? I think I could sorta meet you half way there.

I think you’ve ignored my original argument. The fact that people make moral arguments to begin with means morality is objective. And an objective morality has to have a source. I’m coming to the conclusion from the opposite side. Objective morality is proof for God, not the other way around.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by Flats

Member since Jul 2019

21987 posts

Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:08 pm to StrongOffer

quote:
The fact that people make moral arguments to begin with means morality is objective.

I would tweak that slightly to say that it means people believe and act as if morality is, at least in some cases, objective. Even those who claim it's not typically behave as if it is.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ThuperThumpin

Member since Dec 2013

7416 posts

Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:10 pm to StrongOffer

quote:
think you’ve ignored my original argument

Lol....I just realized that and just rephrase my question. Sorry..doing busy work while trying to have a discussion like this is not the best idea.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ThuperThumpin

Member since Dec 2013

7416 posts

Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:13 pm to StrongOffer

quote:
Objective morality is proof for God, not the other way around.

shite..you lost me again...

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by ThuperThumpin

Member since Dec 2013

7416 posts

Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:23 pm to StrongOffer

So you beleive a universal objective morality exist and humans are evolving towards an understanding of that morality...is that correct?

I'm trying to understand how you define the changes in what we view as moral and immoral. Thats why I say it's subjective. What word besides morality do you use? Does that make sense?

This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 5:30 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board