Started By
Message

re: Qualified Immunity for Concealed Permit Holders?

Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:57 am to
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41802 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:57 am to
Am I ignorant to the possibilities or is this a terrible idea? Concealed permit holders are already going to be ok from a legal standpoint as long as they are protecting themselves or others while firing their weapon with the exception of gross negligence. Correct? Why would we need QI for them?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141006 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 12:02 pm to
Criminal vs civil

Trump was found guilty in a civil case that would have failed miserably if it were criminal due to the lack of evidence.


This keeps the thugs family from taking you over in a civil case.

That’s the dem strategy. Bankrupt those you don’t like.

NYNOLA wants people sued by thug lawyers apparently.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 12:08 pm
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
5434 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Am I ignorant to the possibilities or is this a terrible idea? Concealed permit holders are already going to be ok from a legal standpoint as long as they are protecting themselves or others while firing their weapon with the exception of gross negligence. Correct? Why would we need QI for them?



I agree the civil lawsuits are bullshite. It sounds more like a reason for tort reform. I still don't understand what the concealed carry class has to do with rewarding qualified immunity to some members of civilian society?

The majority of my CC class was dealing with laws and when to engage etc. Extra knowledge of the law still doesn't seam reason to grant someone with a special immunity.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram