Started By
Message

re: tAthletic Early Power Rankings: Saints come in at #28

Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:41 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425838 posts
Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Whether theyre in a neg or positive those are the numbers idiot.

You don't understand how the numbers interact with each other and the net result

quote:

. The cap savings stays the same either way.

Not all cuts result in savings, so how is this statement true?

Sometimes a cut adds money to your cap, decreasing cap space. This is the opposite of "savings"

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116964 posts
Posted on 2/19/24 at 8:49 am to
What are we even arguing about in this thread?

What has a better chance of happening?

a) The saints being worse next year

b) the saints being better

(Its a, easily)
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 2/19/24 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

You don't understand how the numbers interact with each other and the net result


Reading all of this shows the opposite. You def seem confused.

quote:

Not all cuts result in savings, so how is this statement true? Sometimes a cut adds money to your cap, decreasing cap space. This is the opposite of "savings"


Semantics. The cap saving is the no going back to the team if a cut occurs. How that affects their salary cap is irrelevant. Its the same no either way, applied differently based upon circumstances.

Thats why the column says “cap savings.”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram