Started By
Message

re: Matt McMahon has to be the most frustrated coach among the SEC

Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by mcmaniacinsaneasylum
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2023
1976 posts
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

This is false, those players won more NCAA tourney games than we had top 10 classes.


I specifically said WADE had more top 10 recruiting classes than NCAAT wins. I'm not counting the games where he wasn't the coach. Those wins go to the assistant and it can be shown on sportsreference or any similar sight.

Our best NCAAT run was when Wade wasn't even coaching. Sure he brought the players in but they didn't even need him during the tournament to produce the best run since Brady.

And to respond to another poster, yes I know Kentucky had a bad year around the same time. I promise their fans weren't pleased either.

Looking at the big picture, I do think Wade's tenure was overall successful and good for LSU. I do still think he underachieved RELATIVE to the talent he brought in. He did not underachieve relative to LSU. Since you like to make distinctions in argument Madking I would hope you would realize that was the scope under which I was arguing. Regardless, I'm done arguing and I hope you have a good rest of your day. Let's get this win against Florida. Happy Mardi Gras.

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47979 posts
Posted on 2/13/24 at 12:59 pm to
So you’re jumping back and forth between “talent” and “Wade’s NCAA wins” by using games he didn’t coach in to discredit him and say the TEAMS underachieved. What you’re saying is false.
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 1:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram