Started By
Message

re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility

Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:19 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96876 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:19 am to
Trump winning seems evident given the arguments.

What I’m wondering about is what precedents will be set from this going forward.


States will be unable to DQ someone. What about a federal government where the incumbent declares his opponents insurgents?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
80351 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:24 am to
quote:

What about a federal government where the incumbent declares his opponents insurgents?


There’s a word for that: dictatorship.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
26176 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:25 am to
quote:

What I’m wondering about is what precedents will be set from this going forward.


It certainly opens the door up for uniform Ballot laws and standards as opposed to each state making their own ballot counting measures which can disenfranchise other states.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram