- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jennifer Crumbly (school shooter mom) verdict in: Guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:50 pm to Tr33fiddy
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:50 pm to Tr33fiddy
quote:
Did she know their son was a physco and still bought him the gun?
The parents believed he had some mental issues, but nothing on this level. The parents went to school the morning of the shooting cause a he drew a disturbing picture of his gun and blood. Parents and administrators decided the kid could stay at school that day.
There were a lot of mistakes here and I do feel the parents have some to blame, but to charge them with involuntary manslaughter is crazy here. They never knew what the gun was for, he never had a motive, the State didn’t prove they were directly involved by not locking up the gun that morning.
It’s crazy. Again, I think the jurors made an emotional verdict here
5
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:57 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Parents and administrators decided the kid could stay at school that day.
they have the ultimate say in whether or not he could stay...anything happen to them?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:57 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Parents and administrators decided the kid could stay at school that day.
So following the logic of the jury, seems the administrators should have some charges as well?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 1:00 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
The parents went to school the morning of the shooting cause a he drew a disturbing picture of his gun and blood. Parents and administrators decided the kid could stay at school that day.
So, are the administrators going to be charged as well?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 2:08 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Again, I think the jurors made an emotional verdict here
It's Detroit. She's white. She had no chance.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:48 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:I don't necessarily disagree with your overall premise but my pushback would be(and correct me if I have details wrong here) they bought a 9mm handgun for a 15 year old kid but never knew why he wanted it or what he wanted to use it for?
The parents believed he had some mental issues, but nothing on this level. The parents went to school the morning of the shooting cause a he drew a disturbing picture of his gun and blood. Parents and administrators decided the kid could stay at school that day.
There were a lot of mistakes here and I do feel the parents have some to blame, but to charge them with involuntary manslaughter is crazy here. They never knew what the gun was for
I think it's all true that they knew he'd had some delusions or drawings of killing kid at school or something along those lines? I think you put all that together and buying him a gun just cause, this one feels a bit different IMO...but I'm not completely well versed on the facts.
But yea, it does create a slippery slope going forward.
This post was edited on 2/6/24 at 3:55 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News