Started By
Message

re: Zion is closer to being right than you think.

Posted on 2/3/24 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111252 posts
Posted on 2/3/24 at 12:44 pm to
But if you move Zion, there's no reason to keep BI, so you may as well move him too.
Posted by AboveTheRim
Member since Sep 2020
478 posts
Posted on 2/3/24 at 4:08 pm to
We don’t agree on this and that’s okay .

Moving Zion doesn’t mean rebuild imo . if you bring in a high level player that can shoot the ball from 3 ( Mikal Brides type ) or a player that you think can make a big jump over the next season or 2.



The problem with BI and Zion together is they score from the same area … getting one of them out of the others way helps. It’s trust BI as a player long term more than I do Zion.


Now if you can get Mikal or one of the players described above without moving BI or Zion , you do it assuming it doesn’t completely cripple the depth of the roster .
This post was edited on 2/3/24 at 4:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram