Started By
Message

re: USCP will not charge anyone in the Senate gay sex video.

Posted on 2/1/24 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27489 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

There are laws on the books preventing people from just having at it in public buildings.

In what possible sense could expecting people to be prosecuted for violating the law on film in an egregious way be considered nonsense?


Link me to what you believe to be the controlling statute in this situation.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11357 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Link me to what you believe to be the controlling statute in this situation.

District of Columbia Official Code §22-1312: Lewd, Indecent, or Obscene Acts

What's Prohibited?
Under District of Columbia indecent exposure laws, it is considered unlawful for a person to make an obscene or indecent exposure of his or her genitalia or anus, to engage in masturbation, or to engage in a sexual act in public. The statute also makes it unlawful for a person to make an obscene or indecent sexual proposal to a minor.

Penalty
In Washington D.C., an individual who violates any provision of this law will be guilty of a misdemeanor. Upon conviction, a person guilty of this crime may be fined up to $500, imprisoned for up to 90 days, or

Any public building is by definition public.

Whether someone walked in or it was captured on closed circuit security makes no legal difference whatsoever.

They had no legal right to be naked having sex in a public building and no defense attorney would even attempt to claim they did.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram