- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baldwin charged again
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:09 pm to Saint Alfonzo
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:09 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Did they also tell him to point a loaded weapon at the cinematographer and pull the trigger?
They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:12 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:14 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.
Link to this?
Baldwin continually claims he didn’t pull the trigger, why would he be worried if there was a live round if he didn’t pull the trigger? Why would he state it was cleared, if he didn’t pull the trigger?
From all accounts I’ve seen, the gun was never cleared.
From a People article:
According to a statement of probable cause filed in the First Judicial Court in New Mexico, Baldwin didn’t receive required firearms training; did not ask Gutierrez-Reed to show him that the gun contained no live rounds; ignored safety complaints from crew members; and put his finger “on the trigger of a real firearm when a replica or rubber gun should have been used.”
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:15 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.
A real gun isn't a "prop." Again, who told him to point a real gun at the cinematographer and then pull the trigger?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 8:13 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.
He unfortunately has the issue of being not just an actor here but running the set and being their boss.
The fact that they had multiple issues with live rounds prior allegedly will be a real challenge for his liability
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News