Started By
Message

re: Baldwin charged again

Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:09 pm to
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
15211 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Did they also tell him to point a loaded weapon at the cinematographer and pull the trigger?


They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
29079 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:12 pm to
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
21474 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.


Link to this?

Baldwin continually claims he didn’t pull the trigger, why would he be worried if there was a live round if he didn’t pull the trigger? Why would he state it was cleared, if he didn’t pull the trigger?

From all accounts I’ve seen, the gun was never cleared.

From a People article:

According to a statement of probable cause filed in the First Judicial Court in New Mexico, Baldwin didn’t receive required firearms training; did not ask Gutierrez-Reed to show him that the gun contained no live rounds; ignored safety complaints from crew members; and put his finger “on the trigger of a real firearm when a replica or rubber gun should have been used.”



Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
23819 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.

A real gun isn't a "prop." Again, who told him to point a real gun at the cinematographer and then pull the trigger?
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11640 posts
Posted on 1/20/24 at 8:13 am to
quote:

They specifically told him it was a harmless prop not a loaded weapon. There were two people, the armorer and assistant director, who were supposed to make sure there was no chance the gun could fire a live round.


He unfortunately has the issue of being not just an actor here but running the set and being their boss.

The fact that they had multiple issues with live rounds prior allegedly will be a real challenge for his liability

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram