- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prosecutorial Misconduct Reform
Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:35 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:No, it isn't. The defendant pays only what he is obligated to pay to the plaintiff for their damages and their damages only. There is no separate line item on the verdict form for attorney's fees. In fact, they are expressly not allowed by statute in most cases, including medical malpractice.
But it is.
As it it, the winning plaintiff pays her attorney out of her own pocket. The same way the winning defendant pays his attorney out of his own pocket (or out of his insurance company's pocket).
Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:57 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:Of course it is. Were the Chinese bribing Joe Biden if the payola passed by arrangement through Hunter first? Of course they were.
No, it isn't.
Given a contingency arrangement, what is the fee risk to the plaintiff?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)