Started By
Message

re: Prosecutorial Misconduct Reform

Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14544 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

But it is.
No, it isn't. The defendant pays only what he is obligated to pay to the plaintiff for their damages and their damages only. There is no separate line item on the verdict form for attorney's fees. In fact, they are expressly not allowed by statute in most cases, including medical malpractice.

As it it, the winning plaintiff pays her attorney out of her own pocket. The same way the winning defendant pays his attorney out of his own pocket (or out of his insurance company's pocket).
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 1/19/24 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

No, it isn't.
Of course it is. Were the Chinese bribing Joe Biden if the payola passed by arrangement through Hunter first? Of course they were.

Given a contingency arrangement, what is the fee risk to the plaintiff?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram