Started By
Message

re: Paramount Erasing James T. Kirk From Star Trek Franchise?

Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:33 am to
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
26077 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Yet that concern was secondary to employing talented writers who could create believable and multifaceted characters who the audience could embrace.



Such is the opinion of a white hetero cis male who supports misogyny & is a symbol of the colonizer patriarchy!





Did I get it right?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18183 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Such is the opinion of a white hetero cis male who supports misogyny & is a symbol of the colonizer patriarchy!



Did I get it right?




Hammer to nail.

Yet like you and VON indicate above, it is seen as what it is and recognized as little more than a middle finger to devoted male fans of TOS who are boomers and generation Xers.

Yet the problem for the current generation of woke writers in the ST franchise is this: TOS is largely embraced by fans across all generations.

So while Stacy Abrams’ cameo has been reduced to little more than bad punchline to a throwaway joke* and will be largely forgotten in years to come, ST TOS will continue to maintain fans among future generations.

* “A UN Commission On World Hunger has issued a scientific study that finds that if Stacey Abrams would simply cut down to a 5000 calorie a day diet, she could cure world hunger in 6 months.”

This post was edited on 1/13/24 at 12:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram