- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump’s Boldest Argument Yet: Immunity From Prosecution for Assassinations
Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:03 am to udtiger
Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:03 am to udtiger
quote:
"But the party CONVICTED"
Impeachment = Indictment by House (essentially, a grand jury)
The Senate conducts the trial and CONVICTS (or acquits).
Thus, only after that process does the person impeached become "the party convicted" and only at that point are they subject to the other processes.
You are adding intent that isn't there. It clearly allows the judicial check preventing the argument the legislative punishment is the sole punishment. It does not indicate it is meant to work the other direction, nothing in the texts indicates that if the legislative check is not used the judicial check no longer exists. The idea of 2 checks on each branch is a core principle, if the intent was to make one of those checks dependent on the other it would have been presented in clear language.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News