Started By
Message

re: NASA pushes back dates for Artemis II and Artemis III missions.

Posted on 1/9/24 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by NASA_ISS_Tiger
Huntsville, Al via Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2005
7995 posts
Posted on 1/9/24 at 3:35 pm to
The issues are the main engines and the technology behind them. They are still using SSMEs (Space Shuttle Main Engines) to power SLS. Once they run out of those they have to redesign or purchase them. Then they have to be certified for man rated spaceflight. The avionics and other systems are archaic at best. There are over 70,000 failure modes. Literally if printed all the failure modes off and stacked the reams of paper it would be half the height (212 ft) of the full stack. It's at least the height of the core stage. Then add to the fact the valves and other systems have to either be (a) sole sourced from a single vendor or (b) have to sit on a self and have a shelf life for the life of the vehicle....it's a poor way to run a space vehicle management.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
61972 posts
Posted on 1/9/24 at 4:31 pm to
Thanks for the info. Using that logic, it is possible that Artemis 2 and 3 could be totally scrubbed?

Like they are trying to play catch up with something that they cant catch

Is that situation, trying to use old technology, a function of funding or just old people not wanting to change?



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram