- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:28 am to The Pirate King
quote:
If it's truly a co-OC situation, it's probably a money thing,
Meaning that we don’t want to pay for a big name OC?
I doubt that.
There’s plenty of reason to keep continuity in coaching, playcalling recruiting etc to promote from within particularly because Kelly is supposed to be a little more hands on in the offensive side.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:36 am to The Pirate King
quote:
If it's truly a co-OC situation, it's probably a money thing, especially since they just paid Baker 2.5.
I don't think it's about going cheap. It's more likely an effort to retain two high-quality assistants. We were just willing to pay Denbrock $2MM and I'm guessing they were anticipating House's buyout when they made Denbrock that offer.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:57 am to The Pirate King
quote:
If it's truly a co-OC situation, it's probably a money thing, especially since they just paid Baker 2.5.
Hankton is literally the highest paid WR coach that isn't also an OC. They can give him a small bump and make him co-OC, but I can't see how he can demand much more.
If that isn't enough, I look at either Ron Dugans (FSU) or Billy Gonzales (Florida). Both are making $500k compared to Hankton's $900k and have a good history of developing WRs.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 11:02 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News