- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court agrees to review Trump’s Colorado ballot ban in historic case
Posted on 1/7/24 at 9:52 am to BamaAtl
Posted on 1/7/24 at 9:52 am to BamaAtl
quote:Sorry, but IAW with EC rules and the Constitution, if Pence chose to not open the envelopes in question, the outcome determination would have been forwarded to the HOR for adjudication. Whatever the HOR found would stand as the final electoral result.
He did not - there were no disputes about electoral votes that needed adjudication.
Let's repeat that last part, because you're a little slow on the uptake. If Pence did not open the envelopes in question, the result would have been forwarded to the HOR for adjudication. Whatever the HOR found would stand as the final electoral result.
So when Trump refers to Pence "doing the right thing," leaving the controversial envelopes unopened and asking the HOR to review the election is the point of reference.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News