- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court agrees to review Trump’s Colorado ballot ban in historic case
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:37 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:37 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The part that's resulted in scores of felony convictions.
I already said a protest became a riot.
That has nothing to do with "insurrection"
1
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:37 pm to Floyd Dawg
quote:
Floyd Dawg
I'm sorry that your panties are in a wad because I didn't state that the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's factual finding that Trump engaged in insurrection and is ineligible for the ballot.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:38 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
At the moment, this is incorrect. Per the Colorado Supreme Court.
Nope. Dummy. The Colorado Supreme Court ruling stated that their decision was stayed if an appeal was made pending the result of that appeal. You are 100% wrong. As per usual.
Trump, at this moment, is eligible to be on the ballot.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:39 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
How many were for insurrection?
I forget, but a nonzero number were convicted for seditious conspiracy.
However, it's lucky for me that the 14th Amendment doesn't require a conviction in any sense to legally exclude Trump from the ballot because of his engaging in insurrection.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:39 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's self-executing,
Based on which supreme Court case?
quote:
Whatever it was, Colorado and Maine judges consider it satisfied.
Well they're compromised intellectually and partisan
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
At the moment, this is incorrect. Per the Colorado Supreme Court.
You should do some actual reading (and not David French).
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I already said a protest became a riot.
What was the point of the protest? How about the riot?
What was the ultimate goal that day, in their own words?
We can even leave aside hanging our current VP.
What did they want to happen? What did they violently try to do?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:41 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I forget, but a nonzero number were convicted for seditious conspiracy.
Not a single person was charged with insurrection.
quote:
However, it's lucky for me that the 14th Amendment doesn't require a conviction in any sense to legally exclude Trump from the ballot because of his engaging in insurrection.
Trump is, at this moment, eligible to be on the Colorado ballot. Once again, you have no clue as to the law, yet opine from a place of complete ignorance.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Based on which supreme Court case?
Based on insurrectionists in the past being excluded from federal office.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:41 pm to BamaAtl
Wager on Trump being on the ballot in every state in November ?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:42 pm to BamaAtl
I am so glad you came back. This will entertain me until I go to bed.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Based on insurrectionists in the past being excluded from federal office.
Again. Read the entirety of the 14th amendment and stop making a fool of yourself.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What was the point of the protest?
Lots of protests with lots of reasons
quote:
How about the riot?
Irrational mob mental. It was very popular in 2020. Caused a summer of terrorism
quote:
We can even leave aside hanging our current VP.
Pence is alive and umhanged
quote:
What did they want to happen?
A novel legal challenge to the EC certifications
Perfectly legal to try
quote:
What did they violently try to do?
Stand up to cops like we saw in most cities all summer in 2020
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Based on insurrectionists in the past being excluded from federal office.
An admission of intellectual dishonesty
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Not a single person was charged with insurrection.
Is the problem that you don't know what seditious conspiracy is?
quote:
Trump is, at this moment, eligible to be on the Colorado ballot.
Incorrect. The ruling is stayed, true, but without SCOTUS overturning the Colorado Supreme Court (or granting cert and slow-walking past November, which doesn't appear to be the case after today) he will be ineligible to appear on the ballot.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Read the entirety of the 14th amendment
It's very clear that Section 3 is self-executing and Section 5 doesn't require them to make specific laws.
So clear, in fact, that 3 was used already without said laws. It's already been done, and you're already wrong.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:45 pm to BamaAtl
So you’d be comfortable making a wager :)
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:45 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
If the SCOTUS sides with the Colorado Supreme Court Groomers I think we can all agree Fundamental Transformation is complete
The Republic will be lost for sure. Welcome to fascism and tyranny.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 7:46 pm to Dday63
quote:
Do you believe a person who has been convicted of impeachment and disqualified from holding office can still run for President
What impeachment was Trump convicted of? First one? Second one?
When did Congress disqualify Trump from running for office?
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News