NIL pay for play needs to be binding contract to hold these pompous egos in check

quote:

---

You want how much? Here is where you sign on the dotted line.

---

They do sign on the dotted line when they sign NIL contracts

quote:

---

You want to get what you want, the coach team and school want to protect their interest.

---

The coach and school are not paying their NIL checks. In fact, the coach can leave whenever he wants, without penalty, as his new school pays his buyout.

I'm sure some of these NIL contracts have clauses preventing players from earning in perpetuity regardless of school affiliation, which effectivley work the same as a buyout.

If a booster decides to give a player 10 million dollars to commit to the school of his choosing, why should the player be punished for that booster being a moron?

quote:

---

And unless you are projected to be a high round draft pick, you are not allowed to opt out of a bowl game

---

Can they use any mock draft or just the one you like the most?

Coaches opt out of the bowl games and you arent trying to fix that. They definitely signed on the dotted line.

It’s pompous to sit out a meaningless exhibition game?

Interesting.

quote:

---

Any questions son?

---

Yes coach. Why would I sign your NIL collective contract when Bumfrick Toyota down the street agreed to pay me twice your offer? Without the contract. Should I take my 5 stars and go elsewhere?