- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Haley declines to say slavery was cause of Civil War
Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:15 am to Cuz413
Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:15 am to Cuz413
quote:
eta: to understand the nuances of the War for Southern Independence, you must understand the cultural differences between the North and the South and how it has been there since before the American War for Independence.
I do.
And every point you make still points back to slavery being the point of contention.
Once again I’m not demonizing the south and praising the north. It just is what it is.
ETA: a lot of people sound like RINOs in the truest sense in this thread.
This post was edited on 12/28/23 at 8:17 am
Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:23 am to rmnldr
quote:
And every point you make still points back to slavery being the point of contention.
So when the North wanted to secede after the Louisiana purchase because all of these States were going to be new agrarian minded people, not mercantile people like the North, they convened and it was scuttled.
Or like when the North was severely hampered by the naval blockades prohibiting trading with the British during the war of 1812 and they convened at the Hartford convention to present the prospect of secession.
Both of those were over slavery? Or MONEY?
The nullification of 1830 and the Tariff of Abominations was over slavery?
The South's cotton and sugar exportation was larger than the North's entire GDP. The South was where the money was and not just for plantation owners.
But you're telling me if the North would have treated the South like Spain or France and recognized them as an independent nation, we still would have had a war over slavery?
If that's the case, why haven't we waged war against every nation on Earth that recognizes the institution of slavery in the name of freeing all slaves?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News