- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Raffensperger refusing to testify about Georgia's voting machines
Posted on 12/27/23 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/27/23 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Holes in the system are irrelevant for purposes of discussing 2020 if they weren't exploited.
You don't know if they weren't exploited and the flaws in the system prevent it from passing an audit that would indicate that they weren't exploited.
quote:
What people are asking for is actual evidence of the alleged fraud from 2020. It's been 3 years and we're still waiting.
There's tons of evidence. Do you want evidence or rock solid definitive proof. Statistical anomalies are evidence. Defiance of state law is evidence. Breaking of procedure is evidence. Lies that remove independent poll watchers during counting is evidence. Duplicate images is evidence. Counts that don't match physical ballots is evidence. Lack of chain of custody is evidence.
All of this is in Georgia. Why would you claim that there's no evidence.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 4:30 pm to moneyg
quote:
You don't know if they weren't exploited
Where did I I did?
quote:
and the flaws in the system prevent it from passing an audit that would indicate that they weren't exploited.
Again, irrelevant to what I said.
I already ceded the security argument for purpose of this thread. Now it's about evidence of the exploitation of those security issues.
quote:
Do you want evidence or rock solid definitive proof. Statistical anomalies are evidence. Defiance of state law is evidence. Breaking of procedure is evidence. Lies that remove independent poll watchers during counting is evidence. Duplicate images is evidence. Counts that don't match physical ballots is evidence. Lack of chain of custody is evidence.
The only 2 of those with any weight are the statistics and counts that don't match, IF they are what you claim they are.
Any unbiased sourcing on these 2? Or at least credible and apolitical?
quote:
Why would you claim that there's no evidence.
Hundreds of millions of dollars have been paid instead of relying on this allegedly pervasive evidence. That's just for the court cases.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News