Started By
Message

re: Lose Denbrock or Sloan?

Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59431 posts
Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:07 pm to
I agree. We may have kept Sloan for 1 more year--he was going to be an OC or maybe even HC at a smaller school (I think he was offered the ULM job the year they hired Bowden). I would rather have 37-year-old Sloan and his future over 59-year-old Denbrock and his. Not saying I like Denbrock leaving and wouldn't prefer both, but OP is right that we realistically were only gonna be able to keep 1 longer than 1 more season. And I'd prefer it be Sloan.
Posted by Manswers
Michigan
Member since Feb 2009
3619 posts
Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Not saying I like Denbrock leaving and wouldn't prefer both, but OP is right that we realistically were only gonna be able to keep 1 longer than 1 more season. And I'd prefer it be Sloan.


Yes, and it happened in a way that ND is paying LSU $2M. If we had to lose Denbrock, this is not a bad way for it to happen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram