Started By
Message

re: Kelly supports the Bama over FSU decision

Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:03 pm to
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20048 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

This is not the compelling argument that is used to be. The gap between the SEC and everyone else has been getting smaller, and it’s not about to let up.


It’s also not a compelling argument when the teams that have an argument to get it outside the SEC beat SEC teams.

All this “committee got it right” talk is almost entirely self serving.

They have created an arbitrary reason to leave a team out. The guideline is “availability of players and coaches”, it’s not star QB and it’s not “ACC sucks”

I don’t really care if it may benefit LSU in the future to maybe get some SEC bias. I want LSU and other teams to continue to try and win as many games as possible

The only control a team has is winning their games. FSU did that with and without their QB. They won a championship 10 years ago, they have made the playoff in the past, their conference has won since then, and even Notre Dame (a quasi member) has made it several times.

This is bad for college football and if you can see it you are very short sighted.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
610 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

The only control a team has is winning their games. FSU did that with and without their QB. They won a championship 10 years ago, they have made the playoff in the past, their conference has won since then, and even Notre Dame (a quasi member) has made it several times.

This is bad for college football and if you can see it you are very short sighted.


And they did it with a weaker schedule. If SoS doesn't matter, then put Liberty in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram