- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN said the quite part out loud about why FSU got snubbed
Posted on 12/4/23 at 7:06 pm to NastyNatiNole
Posted on 12/4/23 at 7:06 pm to NastyNatiNole
So from reading the CFP information from there website. There is a lot of ways they went way from what they were supposed to do.
When they created this, they for one were supposed to eliminate the eye test. So they are supposed to compare teams with similar records. 3 teams of undefeated should have been compared then the teams with other records. So the three with undefeated records should have been left in and then move on to the next comparisons. That would have been the next in line with teams with one lost, as those are not comparable with a no loss team. So to the part about an important player is mute, because only 3 teams were "at the margin" were comparable.
They have another section that says the regular season is unique and should be "preserved".
In another section they went out of their way to make sure {teams who "deserve" to be selected} are not to be left out. So the narrative, on the most "deserving" or the "best" , is also mute, because they have it listed.
So they went out of their way, to go away from what they were supposed to do, because of their "eye" test, which is not supposed to be part of the selection process.
When they created this, they for one were supposed to eliminate the eye test. So they are supposed to compare teams with similar records. 3 teams of undefeated should have been compared then the teams with other records. So the three with undefeated records should have been left in and then move on to the next comparisons. That would have been the next in line with teams with one lost, as those are not comparable with a no loss team. So to the part about an important player is mute, because only 3 teams were "at the margin" were comparable.
They have another section that says the regular season is unique and should be "preserved".
In another section they went out of their way to make sure {teams who "deserve" to be selected} are not to be left out. So the narrative, on the most "deserving" or the "best" , is also mute, because they have it listed.
So they went out of their way, to go away from what they were supposed to do, because of their "eye" test, which is not supposed to be part of the selection process.
Posted on 12/5/23 at 6:39 am to NastyNatiNole
quote:
When they created this, they for one were supposed to eliminate the eye test. So they are supposed to compare teams with similar records. 3 teams of undefeated should have been compared then the teams with other records. So the three with undefeated records should have been left in and then move on to the next comparisons. That would have been the next in line with teams with one lost, as those are not comparable with a no loss team. So to the part about an important player is mute, because only 3 teams were "at the margin" were comparable.
This is correct.
Under THEIR RULES, you don’t get to the analysis they supposedly performed between Bama and FSU until you determine they are “otherwise comparable teams.” There was no way to possibly determine they were “otherwise comparable teams” (two teams with different W-L records) WITHOUT THE ANALYSIS.
Ask anyone to tell you how Bama and FSU were deemed “otherwise comparable teams” and you will see the circular topsy-turvy “logic” that had to be employed to get here.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News