- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prehistoric women were probably better at hunting than men, scientists suggest
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:28 pm to Fat and Happy
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:28 pm to Fat and Happy
quote:
I’m sure all the strength, power, size, and testosterone wasn’t used at all
Exactly. Give me a stick and don't feed me for a week and I'd still kick the shite out of 5 bitches who skipped lunch.
1
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:33 pm to X123F45
So biologically, women are:
- Weaker
- Slower
- Less coordinated
- Worse at judging spatial relationships
They were therefore better at hunting, which requires people to be strong, fast, coordinated, and adept at judging distance? Huh.
- Weaker
- Slower
- Less coordinated
- Worse at judging spatial relationships
They were therefore better at hunting, which requires people to be strong, fast, coordinated, and adept at judging distance? Huh.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News