Started By
Message

re: Prehistoric women were probably better at hunting than men, scientists suggest

Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:22 pm to
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9289 posts
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:22 pm to
Their point is that estrogen helps in extreme endurance competitions like ultramarathons, therefore it must have been useful in persistence hunting situations. BUT… what sort of hunting expedition chases prey for hundreds of miles so that estrogen becomes an advantage, a la ultramarathon?

And the study really does just brush aside the fact that a woman back then was likely pregnant every year of her adult life. How could they spend all that time bringing home the bacon, literally… in that condition year after year… more so than the men?
Posted by AUTiger1978
Member since Jan 2018
915 posts
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Their point is that estrogen helps in extreme endurance competitions like ultramarathons, therefore it must have been useful in persistence hunting situations. BUT… what sort of hunting expedition chases prey for hundreds of miles so that estrogen becomes an advantage, a la ultramarathon?


It’s like they never considered that if they had to run 100 miles to complete the kill they would also have to lug the fruits of their kill back to the tribe. Do we really think these cave dwelling women went and ran a ultramarathon, killed an animal and then walked the meat 75 miles back to the stay-at-home dads? Have these idiot scientists ever seen what these ultramarathon women look like after a race? Or that those ultramarathon women look frail as hell before the race even starts?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram