Started By
Message

re: Decade old on this, but 3D printing is amazing

Posted on 11/15/23 at 8:38 am to
Posted by Tangineck
Mandeville
Member since Nov 2017
1886 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 8:38 am to
3D printing of metal is incredible, but an often overlooked aspect by hobbyists is that the finish isn't good enough for sealing or mating surfaces. In nearly all cases there is still required machining on the prints for usable parts. For very complex, one off parts it is viable, but it has yet to replace castings for mass produced parts because of cost.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78786 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:41 am to
quote:

3D printing of metal is incredible, but an often overlooked aspect by hobbyists is that the finish isn't good enough for sealing or mating surfaces. In nearly all cases there is still required machining on the prints for usable parts. For very complex, one off parts it is viable, but it has yet to replace castings for mass produced parts because of cost.
when apple released quicktime in the early 1990s it was 160x160 pixels and played at 5fps on the top-of-the-line $10k apple iifx. I said "no way they can ever do rich video on a computer.

Give it some time
This post was edited on 11/15/23 at 9:43 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119556 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:21 am to
quote:

3D printing of metal is incredible, but an often overlooked aspect by hobbyists is that the finish isn't good enough for sealing or mating surfaces. In nearly all cases there is still required machining on the prints for usable parts. For very complex, one off parts it is viable, but it has yet to replace castings for mass produced parts because of cost.




The next big hurdle to overcome with metal printing is strength. Anyone who has taken a materials course learns that the strength of steel and other metals are gained by hot or cold working the steel to align the grain structure.

With interest in learning how strong is 3D metal printing the first link that popped up was this YT LINK.

Here is the summary of testing these clips to failure. The weakest was PLA, then Aluminum and then Stainless Steel.

>


I would have expected the stainless steel to be MUCH stronger than Aluminum. The stainless steel used in 3D printing is stainless with the "L" designations indicating low carbon content. That is, it is weldable The low carbon content stainless will not rust after welding, via laser welding in 3D printing.

The tensile strength of ANSI 316L stainless is 74700 psi. About the same for 304L.

The tensile strength of Aluminum varies by grade but it is generally around 42,000 psi.

Under normal circumstances you would expect the stainless steel to be almost twice as strong as aluminum. However it appears that 3D printed stainless steels is only slightly stronger than aluminum due to the lack of aligned grain structure.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram