- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yesterday's targeting call was to put CBK in his place
Posted on 11/12/23 at 4:45 pm to jacquespene8
Posted on 11/12/23 at 4:45 pm to jacquespene8
quote:show some screen shots? of LEADING contact with crown of helmet.
“Targeting,” like holding, can be called on every play by the “letter of the law…” the fact that they chose to pluck Sam’s hit out of that play, when no one on the field or tv had a clue what was being reviewed….that was telling. The sec refs didn’t even wait til a decent hit happened…
This post was edited on 11/12/23 at 5:12 pm
3
Posted on 11/12/23 at 4:51 pm to choupiquesushi
they need to have two versions of the penalty.
like basketball with flagrants
like basketball with flagrants
Posted on 11/12/23 at 5:35 pm to choupiquesushi
Interesting how these threads bring out the trolls.
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:52 pm to choupiquesushi
Calls on the field are incredibly difficult and will always be inconsistent, esp if you’re out there on Thurs and Fri nights
I always keep in mind that the vast majority of officials just have a desire to remain close to the game and have an appreciation for it
Lord knows it can’t be the money, b/c yall don’t get paid enough. LOL
My questions only relate to when these plays are being reviewed.
It is my contention that the only sensible explanation to the 3 outcomes of the targeting calls in question is some sort of bias.
No sane human being could be asked to review these and determine a ruling on them with these results. Not possible.
I always keep in mind that the vast majority of officials just have a desire to remain close to the game and have an appreciation for it
Lord knows it can’t be the money, b/c yall don’t get paid enough. LOL
My questions only relate to when these plays are being reviewed.
It is my contention that the only sensible explanation to the 3 outcomes of the targeting calls in question is some sort of bias.
No sane human being could be asked to review these and determine a ruling on them with these results. Not possible.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News