quote:
Are you thinking that the not reviewed penalty against Daniels last week, then the not penalized review on Sam this week that led to his ejection are just coincidental?

And a followup to that would be what is your interpretation of the Devin White ejection compared to the Turner non-ejection?

The daniels hit was reviewed, no stoppage of play for review.

I was with a former SEC head coach for the devin white hit, his exact words when the hit was shown - he's gone.

1. it starts with the white hats view and opine, you can't imagine how fast that stuff happens in real life.
2. the angles and views that replay has aren't always the same as what networks show.

and... there are 140 plays in a game. Few people notice when a guy misses a block or makes a wrong read or coach makes a wrong call.. but.... when an officials call is show 11 times everyone has an opine and 99.999% of those people would fail a rules test miserably.

my guess on turner's hit is replay saw something we didn't.
2. t

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by StTiger

Baton Rouge

Member since Nov 2008

2938 posts

Posted on 11/12/23 at 6:54 pm to choupiquesushi

quote:
The daniels hit was reviewed, no stoppage of play for review.

Kelly said the officials on the field said it was reviewed but found out later that it wasn't

If Devin's hit was targeting, Turner's sure as frick was

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Thorny

Montgomery, AL

Member since May 2008

1916 posts

Posted on 11/12/23 at 9:23 pm to choupiquesushi

quote:
1. it starts with the white hats view and opine, you can't imagine how fast that stuff happens in real life.
2. the angles and views that replay has aren't always the same as what networks show.

1. As shown last night, the replay official and the league office can force the white hat to view the replay. I still don't know why that didn't happen in the Daniels case, which leads to #2

2. This is exactly why the league needs to be more transparent about how and why it makes those decisions. If there is some angle that perfectly showed Turner didn't hit Daniels square on the jaw, I would like to see it. I've spent all week ripping Bammers who refuse to see the contact I see, but none of them show me anything that proves me wrong. If the SEC has something like that, they should be open about it. They should also be willing to say, "Hey, the game is fast, and the ref missed that call. It happens." I would like to think fans would have more respect for the league if they ever did that. But, they don't: they never admit the ref got it wrong.

GEAUX TIGERS!

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board