Started By
Message

re: Yesterday's targeting call was to put CBK in his place

Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30795 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

It was targeting by the current rules.Nothing more.
this, people may not agree with the rule but it is the rule, leading contact with the crown of the helmet is targeting.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22395 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 12:23 pm to
So if a flag is not thrown and it is called from a remote review, why is the ball carrier not also ejected for illegally doing the exact same thing, even more deliberately, when we can all clearly see this is what happened?

Is the ball carrier immune to neck injuries?
Posted by taf
Kansas City, KS
Member since Dec 2003
751 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

this, people may not agree with the rule but it is the rule, leading contact with the crown of the helmet is targeting.


Not true. Contact with crown of the helmet must be accompanied by at least one of four indicators of targeting for it to be called targeting.
Posted by dipsydoo3
Member since Sep 2018
113 posts
Posted on 11/12/23 at 8:39 pm to
Now do the running back
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram