quote:
I looked through our last decade of recruiting classes and the hit rate on 3 stars is pretty spotty which might be expexted. I guess broadly speaking 3 stars are 3 stars for a reason and the lower you go in the talent rankings, the less likely you are to hit on starters in that pool. But the recruiting evaluators can't hit on every guy who's going to outplay his ranking.

Did you happen to look at how many 5 stars aren’t what they were supposed to be either? It’s far more than you think.

It’s hot and miss regardless of star rankings and honestly, you can’t tell me with a straight face you don’t thing these rankings have a bias agenda.

You also can’t say a team of 5 stars will win you a championship. A&M says otherwise

You also can’t say a team devoid of 5 stars can’t win a championship. Clemson sure as hell did it.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSUSlidell23

Member since Oct 2023

227 posts

Posted on 10/24/23 at 5:10 pm to J2thaROC

[quote]Did you happen to look at how many 5 stars aren’t what they were supposed to be either? It’s far more than you think.

It’s hot and miss regardless of star rankings and honestly, you can’t tell me with a straight face you don’t thing these rankings have a bias agenda.

You also can’t say a team of 5 stars will win you a championship. A&M says otherwise

You also can’t say a team devoid of 5 stars can’t win a championship. Clemson sure as hell did it.

[/quote

If you look at the top 10 95% of the time they recruit the best players.
OMG! This isn't rocket science.

Yes you can have some three stars that pan out and spme 4 stars that don't but we can go down the list in the NFL roght now and I bet there was more 4 stars anf 5 that 3 stars even though there are about three times as many 3 stars that get recruited than 4 and 5 stars.

This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 5:11 pm

2 ...

Report Post

LSU Recruiting - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board