Started By
Message

re: Trade Proposal

Posted on 10/9/23 at 4:38 pm to
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31991 posts
Posted on 10/9/23 at 4:38 pm to
Just bumping this to say Hockenson is the TE 12 this week in a full PPR tied with studs such as Jonnu Smith and Tyler Conklin who can be found on your waiver wire every week. He’s the TE 16 in a non-PPR with a whopping 51yds

Meanwhile David Montgomery is the RB 5 regardless of scoring.


Why the frick do you guys want to trade a RB1 for ANY TE not named Travis Kelce or Mark Andrew’s?

All TEs suck man, if you don’t have a top guy just play the waiver match ups you’re just as likely to get a good game. Please don’t trade an auto start RB for one of them
Posted by TheWhitemamba16
Dallas
Member since Sep 2018
1063 posts
Posted on 10/9/23 at 10:15 pm to
Ehhh Montgomery’s a very low end rb1 but ahout the best rb2 you can get… why would you stream a tight end every week when/if you have the depth to get a top 4 player at his position… I’m of the mindset that as long you 7 rbs/wrs total (could be 4 rbs and 3 wrs or vice versa) every other player on your bench is pretty much worthless.. especially compared to a top 4 player at the position. Then you have to factor in that every week you are losing waiver priority for a streamed tight end and missing out on the can’t miss waiver wire adds.. if you chose to stream a te every week with first waiver choice you’d never have a shot at puka , k Williams, achanes of the world.. getting those 3 players alone could propel you to a championship with a decent draft or be used to trade for a Kelce/andrews… opportunity cost my man
This post was edited on 10/9/23 at 10:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram