re: Melanie Curtin conviction over turned.

quote:

---

The prosecution has control of the evidence. They apparently "forgot"'about some

---

New evidence found after trial that is relevant to victim saying she would never consent to being filmed having sex with multiple people (affidavit later found from prior divorce in Alabama admitting filming sex with other couples);

Video evidence of victim with Perkins the original judge didn’t allow based on shield law which was relevant as far as questioning victim not consenting to the sex acts with Perkins in video of crime which affects the aggravated part of the aggravated rape charge and relevant to the voyeurism charge & victim saying she would never consent to being film with 3rd person present (similar acts with Perkins including possibly acting like she was passed out with sheet over head & filmed and sex act with Perkins with another female present & also filmed) and should have been allowed; and

evidence the original judge allowed about defendant’s sexual past with Perkins and with an unknown male unrelated to criminal charges or defendant’s testimony that shouldn’t have been allowed.

The one pic that the prosecution didn’t share beforehand wasn’t exculpatory but about defendant’s sexual past with the 3rd party unrelated to case or any testimony by defendant. The judge shouldn’t have allowed it but did.