- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden tapping Bill Nye the 'not really a' science guy
Posted on 10/1/23 at 4:23 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/1/23 at 4:23 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
He cited a paper touting past Climate Models as "skillful" projectors. I responded with a list of ~35-40 papers identifying modeling errors. Some were technical
I seriously can't figure out if you are being deliberately obtuse or are just completely ignorant. I will assume the latter and educate you. ALL models of anything that is continuous in space or time have errors, even if every input is accurate and the model faithfully includes all relevant physics. This is because digital computers cannot represent the mathematics of continuous variables. They can only do discrete mathematics. This includes every single non trivial fluid model in existence: climate models, models of blood flow, models of airflow around an airplane, models of neutron stars, and the models they used to come up with those fins that some 18 wheelers have hanging off their rear ends. Numerical modellers like to be able to quantify these errors so they can know how precise their models are, so they spend a lot of time writing papers on the matter.
You're welcome.
2
Posted on 10/1/23 at 5:23 am to Peebles
quote:You may be afflicted with the worst case of messageboard NSSI that I've ever seen.
I seriously can't figure out if you are being deliberately obtuse or are just completely ignorant. I will assume the latter
How has that assumption thing worked for you so far?
quote:All is relative.
ALL models of anything that is continuous in space or time have errors,
Some things are less of a near miss than others.
This post was edited on 10/1/23 at 5:52 am
Posted on 10/1/23 at 11:15 am to Peebles
quote:you literally know NOTHING about which you are speaking. NOTHING.
I seriously can't figure out if you are being deliberately obtuse or are just completely ignorant. I will assume the latter and educate you. ALL models of anything that is continuous in space or time have errors, even if every input is accurate and the model faithfully includes all relevant physics. This is because digital computers cannot represent the mathematics of continuous variables. They can only do discrete mathematics. This includes every single non trivial fluid model in existence: climate models, models of blood flow, models of airflow around an airplane, models of neutron stars, and the models they used to come up with those fins that some 18 wheelers have hanging off their rear ends. Numerical modellers like to be able to quantify these errors so they can know how precise their models are, so they spend a lot of time writing papers on the matter.
You're welcome.
Your orbital cycles is pretty moro.. interesting...
This post was edited on 10/1/23 at 11:17 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News