- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Woman being sued for defamation for false rape claim
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:03 am
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:03 am
NYT link
quote:
In a 2018 disciplinary hearing at Yale University, Saifullah Khan listened as a woman accused him of raping her after a Halloween party. The woman, who had graduated, gave a statement by teleconference to a university panel, but Mr. Khan and his lawyer were not allowed in the room with the panel. Nor could his lawyer, under the rules of the hearing, cross-examine her.
quote:
Mr. Khan’s criminal trial, months earlier, was markedly different. His lawyer cross-examined the woman in ways that horrified women’s rights advocates: How were you dressed? How much did you drink? Did you send flirty texts? And unlike the Yale hearing, the prosecutors had to prove his guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
quote:
After barely three hours of deliberations, Mr. Khan was acquitted.
quote:
Title IX, the federal education law, governs how universities should handle sexual assault hearings. The Khan hearing was governed by Obama-era guidance, which discouraged cross-examination. In 2020, the Trump administration reversed those guidelines and mandated the practice.
quote:
Mr. Khan, a neuroscience student while at Yale, never earned a bachelor’s degree. He is suing the university as well, for breach of contract and infliction of emotional distress, among other claims. He is seeking $110 million in damages and the opportunity to finish his degree. “Yale took away my 20s,” he said.
25
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:05 am to GeauxxxTigers23
An example needs to be made of these false accusers
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:05 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Good.
She should have to serve whatever time he would’ve gotten if convicted.
She should have to serve whatever time he would’ve gotten if convicted.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:05 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Mr. Khan and his lawyer were not allowed in the room with the panel. Nor could his lawyer, under the rules of the hearing, cross-examine her.
meet the modern day HR, anonymous accusations, guilty until proven innocent
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:07 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Good. Hope he breaks them and her
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:08 am to 777Tiger
Thanks to “progressives” Accusations are now convictions in the USA.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:09 am to Tyga Woods
quote:
She should have to serve whatever time he would’ve gotten if convicted.
yep
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:11 am to 777Tiger
I hope he ruins this woman and takes the university for millions. He said if he wins the defamation case he’s going to make her name public.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:11 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I hope he ruins this woman and takes the university for millions. He said if he wins the defamation case he’s going to make her name public.
same here, that would help turn the tide on this nonsense
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:15 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Title IX, the federal education law, governs how universities should handle sexual assault hearings. The Khan hearing was governed by Obama-era guidance, which discouraged cross-examination.
Was it the Obama administration that was ordering this or were they riding a wave of well-intentioned but horribly misguided attempts at "equality?"
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:16 am to GeauxxxTigers23
This is depressingly common in every walk of life. Combining the mental illness that is spreading like wildfire with our cultural Feminist- centric “ Men have to prove their innocence “ Leftist default setting, men have to really vet women . Crazy is now the norm. Dating/ sex is like taking a crash course in Dysfunctional Womanese anywhere that women who vote for Democrats congregate. You have to protect yourself because Democrat ladies will ruin you for sport in support of their ideology.Conservative women don’t destroy other human beings just because they can.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:16 am to bad93ex
quote:
Was it the Obama administration that was ordering this or were they riding a wave of well-intentioned but horribly misguided attempts at "equality?"
pretty sure that started in the 70s
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:17 am to GeauxxxTigers23
I’ll be curious to see how this shakes out. The disciplinary hearing isn’t worth discussing, as they are just obscene violations of normal due process.
He’s been found not guilty when the state was required to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He is now suing her, which means he bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she lied.
Wouldn’t surprise me to see both fail to carry their burden a both walk away mad.
He’s been found not guilty when the state was required to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He is now suing her, which means he bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she lied.
Wouldn’t surprise me to see both fail to carry their burden a both walk away mad.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:18 am to bad93ex
quote:
Was it the Obama administration that was ordering this or were they riding a wave of well-intentioned but horribly misguided attempts at "equality?"
Why can't it be both .gif
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:18 am to STLDawg
quote:
An example needs to be made of these false accusers
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:19 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Wouldn’t surprise me to see both fail to carry their burden a both walk away mad.
At least it will cost her a bunch of money and time and hopefully discourage other woman from making false rape claims.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:20 am to Joshjrn
quote:
He’s been found not guilty when the state was required to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He is now suing her, which means he bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she lied.
not a lawyer but isn't his suit against her a civil suit? similar to the Goldman's suit against OJ? if so I don't believe the burden of proof is quite as high
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:25 am to 777Tiger
quote:
not a lawyer but isn't his suit against her a civil suit? similar to the Goldman's suit against OJ? if so I don't believe the burden of proof is quite as high
Yes, yes, and yes. Preponderance of the evidence (civil and some evidentiary issues) is a lower standard than by clear and convincing evidence (some evidentiary issues) which is a lower standard than beyond a reasonable doubt (criminal) which is a lower standard than beyond all doubt (which we don’t use).
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:28 am to 777Tiger
quote:
meet the modern day HR, anonymous accusations, guilty until proven innocent
Posted on 9/17/23 at 9:36 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Women lying about being raped? Impossible
I submit the following piece of evidence from everyone’s childhood.
“Girls are made of Sugar and spice
And everything nice, while Boys are made of snips and snails and puppy dog tails”
So you see, it’s impossible…
I submit the following piece of evidence from everyone’s childhood.
“Girls are made of Sugar and spice
And everything nice, while Boys are made of snips and snails and puppy dog tails”
So you see, it’s impossible…
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News