- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas AG Ken Paxton sets his sights on The Regime
Posted on 9/17/23 at 8:47 pm to DrKnievel
Posted on 9/17/23 at 8:47 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
You know how I know you didn’t watch the trial? You left out the part where the Paxton’s moved back in after the renovations were completed in July, the whistleblowers went to the FBI on Sept 29th, Cammack notified Paxton he got a cease and desist on the morning of Sept 30th, paxton had a check cut on the night of Sept 30th from his blind trust to a company that wasn’t licensed in the state in July, and the invoice for the work wasn’t actually created until Oct 1st. But if you had watched, I’m sure you would have mentioned that. So the last time you did renovations, did you have to pay any money up front and did you get to wait months after the work was done to get the bill? Yes - I watched the trial, and you should too
That’s interesting.
Because the prosecution was apparently shown pictures of the kitchen, and had to concede that no renovation was done.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:21 pm to riverdiver
First, I like how you just skipped over the inconvenient facts I stated. You would have been equally successful on Ken’s legal team.
You must really not have been watching. First, the prosecution was presenting this as a conspiracy. You seem to be fixated on the fact that no granite is in place. The testimony; however, was, “I’ll have to check with Nate on the granite”. It was heard at least 3 times. So just by virtue that granite was not installed doesn’t mean the conspiracy didn’t take place. The crime was not granite - the crime was the conspiracy to get something in exchange for his help, and having not paid a cent until authorities were notified isn’t the silver bullet you seem to think it is especially when the invoice was created after the payment.
And just to add insult to injury, Tony introduced those pictures via evidence; however, it was actually part of a bigger document that also included text messages between the parties that incriminated them. Because of the rules that Patrick adopted for the trial (weird hybrid of criminal,and ci I’ll rules), he prevented this evidence from coming into trial for impeachment via testimony - it was admitted as evidence, but they are fair game for a criminal trial.
I’ll use an analogy here. Trump is going second in his Georgia trial because he wants to see what evidence they have and create the best circumstances for his success at trial. What do you think the federal government just did?
Add in the fact that Paxton created this quagmire by firing people (that were legally protected), having them file a whistleblower suit, then settling the lawsuit, he brought this on himself. You don’t fire people and then settle with them that you were wrong!
He has 3 people that have tried to settle and one who refused, so he still will have to answer at some point why he fired people, then negotiated with them. He got out of an impeachment, (which is fairly significant) but I wouldn’t say the war has been won.
And I am serious - check out the trial. The defense wasn’t arguing facts most of the time. They tried to impugn character and they lost more battles than they won.
You must really not have been watching. First, the prosecution was presenting this as a conspiracy. You seem to be fixated on the fact that no granite is in place. The testimony; however, was, “I’ll have to check with Nate on the granite”. It was heard at least 3 times. So just by virtue that granite was not installed doesn’t mean the conspiracy didn’t take place. The crime was not granite - the crime was the conspiracy to get something in exchange for his help, and having not paid a cent until authorities were notified isn’t the silver bullet you seem to think it is especially when the invoice was created after the payment.
And just to add insult to injury, Tony introduced those pictures via evidence; however, it was actually part of a bigger document that also included text messages between the parties that incriminated them. Because of the rules that Patrick adopted for the trial (weird hybrid of criminal,and ci I’ll rules), he prevented this evidence from coming into trial for impeachment via testimony - it was admitted as evidence, but they are fair game for a criminal trial.
I’ll use an analogy here. Trump is going second in his Georgia trial because he wants to see what evidence they have and create the best circumstances for his success at trial. What do you think the federal government just did?
Add in the fact that Paxton created this quagmire by firing people (that were legally protected), having them file a whistleblower suit, then settling the lawsuit, he brought this on himself. You don’t fire people and then settle with them that you were wrong!
He has 3 people that have tried to settle and one who refused, so he still will have to answer at some point why he fired people, then negotiated with them. He got out of an impeachment, (which is fairly significant) but I wouldn’t say the war has been won.
And I am serious - check out the trial. The defense wasn’t arguing facts most of the time. They tried to impugn character and they lost more battles than they won.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News