Started By
Message

re: The Oline progression

Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:34 am to
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9735 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:34 am to
quote:

frick our oline.
If we had the 2003 line, Logan diggs would have gotten around 125 yards instead of 115.

I think people are probably overreacting to FSU but come on man, you’re talking about numbers against a SWAC team.
Posted by BearCrocs
Member since Aug 2013
6512 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:42 am to
I’m starting to think most of our coaches are kinda overrated.

He retained his entire staff less DL coach, right?..

Is that because our staff sucks?
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
3797 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:44 am to
From what i saw, heard has a lot of potential as he dominated on a lot of plays. Our issue is running through the tackles. We saw we can do it last week but against Grambling.

We may need to look at a change at Center as well.

Let's see what happens this week but i think Heard needs to see significant time.


Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30680 posts
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:45 am to
quote:

I think people are probably overreacting to FSU but come on man, you’re talking about numbers against a SWAC team.


It’s just that it wouldn’t matter what was done last week so the timing of the OP is poor.

I don’t know how you bag on the offense after going ten for ten on drives.

If you cannot judge the oline due it it being grambling, then, like….take a day off on the constant bagging.





This place is just insufferable. It cannot be happy with:

JD
GN
BK
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 7:48 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram