Started By
Message

re: Honest apolitical question. Covid.

Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:55 am to
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6958 posts
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:55 am to
quote:

How is it poorly worded? I cited the entire paragraph from the CDC. What am I missing?

Because it's further down in the link that it's comparing it to previous variants.
quote:

Immune Impacts: The large number of mutations in this variant raises concerns of greater escape from existing immunity from vaccines and previous infections compared with other recent variants.

I assume the person writing up these things for the CDC every day for the past year would know they were comparing variants, but to outsiders it isn't so obvious if you just read the heading and not the full release.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25610 posts
Posted on 9/6/23 at 9:02 am to
Which is weird because this isn’t a peer reviewed paper but some thing that is aimed to be suitable for the public. At least that’s my understanding.

The way I see it there are three groups. The unvaccinated who had it. The vaccinated. And those who have neither caught or had the vaccine. It still baffles me as to why those in the last group would be more protected.

This isn’t taking into consideration in the other vaccines, and if they “escape“. And why would that even be tossed into the equation anyways? How about the zero viruses or pathogens escape. I pick that.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 9:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram