- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Foundation
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:27 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 9/1/23 at 11:27 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
I could do this all day!
But we really wish you wouldn't.
That user's statement doesn't make much sense when compared with Rings, though.
RoP was changing details, filling in others, but overall making relatively minor changes. Those minor changes are significant, though, when the author wrote thousands of pages devoted solely to the world-building of his literary universe.
Foundation, and Asimov, had very little interest in minute details of characters or worlds. He plowed through hundreds of years of history and plot, without any memorable characters outside of Seldon, in service of his ideas. The idea of a "faithful adaptation" of Foundation for television is ridiculous. The show has created characters and worlds and villains (The empirical genetic dynasty is awesome, by the way) so that it can function as a normal, modern prestige show.
While I don't give a frick about Tolkein's obsessive world-building (and I wont pretend to know every detail that was changed in the show), it definitely lends itself better to adaptation than any Asimov I've read. Unfortunate that rights holders aren't actually interested in letting the TV show adapt what was fleshed out by Tolkien.
Posted on 9/2/23 at 9:14 am to Jay Are
quote:
(The empirical genetic dynasty is awesome, by the way
And makes sense from a show production standpoint. If you’re gonna follow both Foundation and Empire over the course of hundreds of years you don’t want to make your audience learn new main characters every few episodes.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/2/23 at 10:58 am to Jay Are
quote:
The idea of a "faithful adaptation" of Foundation for television is ridiculous
It’s actually not. A faithful adaption doesn’t have to spot on in every aspect. It should at least feel like the original story. A show where the main story line and characters didn’t even exist and those that did are completely different than they were in the books is not even close. It’s Foundation in name only. I mean it’s not the first time a show has done this and won’t be the last, but I’m not going to give them praise for changing literally everything. You want to pretend it’s even remotely close, that’s fine, but it’s not, and it could have been done closer to the source.
Again, I’m not even arguing it’s a bad show. To argue that they are doing a good job of adapting this book is what’s ridiculous.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)